ombudsman
news
July 2003
issue 29
from the Financial Ombudsman Service

essential reading for financial firms and consumer advisers

in this issue
about this issue
the proceeds of Crime Act 2002
travelling again? travel insurance disputes
not all bonds are 'investments'
banking and mortgages: 'voluntary concessions'
investment case round-up
ask ombudsman news
pdf version issue 29

get reader

about this issue

In this issue of ombudsman news we highlight some practical matters that could affect firms – and us – as a result of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

We focus, too, on some of the complaints we have received about the 'voluntary concessions' that firms sometimes make for their banking and mortgage customers. And we take a look at some of the travel insurance disputes that reach us, highlighting in particular:

  • the circumstances in which insurers provide cover if a holiday is cancelled or curtailed; and

  • the situation where insurers provide no cover for illnesses that arise from a medical condition the traveller has suffered from in the past.

We provide the usual wide-ranging round-up of recent investment-related complaints, and clarify the differences between 'guaranteed income bonds' and 'guaranteed capital bonds'.

And finally, in ask ombudsman news we answer some recent queries from our readers.

 

 

  Produced by the publications team at the Financial Ombudsman Service We hold the copyright to this publication. But you can freely reproduce the text, as long as you quote the source. © Financial Ombudsman Service Limited, July 2003
about us| publications | how to complain | FAQs | news | links | search | contact us | HOME