banking
- 'safe deposit' boxes
Some
banking firms offer their customers a ‘safe custody’
service at certain branches. For a quarterly or annual fee, customers
can arrange to store a box containing their valuables and important
papers (such as jewellery, house deeds or investment certificates)
in the firm’s ‘strong room’ or other secure
area. Customers do not have to give the firm a key to the box,
or declare what items they have stored. They can get access to
their valuables, by arrangement, during banking hours and they
can remove or replace items as they wish.
Most
of the time the service operates without difficulty. But disputes
sometimes arise – generally about whether some of the contents
of a box have gone missing while in the firm’s care. Safe
custody is an 'ancillary banking service' so we are able to look
into these complaints, which can be among the most difficult we
deal with. This is because the customer is often unable to provide
any firm evidence of what was in their safe deposit box. The customer’s
own recollection is not normally enough. And it may not be accurate,
particularly if items have regularly been removed or replaced.
When
we investigate, the first thing we look at is the firm’s
record for the box. This will show the dates when the customer
visited the branch to get access to the box. It should also show
when the customer removed or replaced their box. We generally
find these records are accurate, although occasionally they are
not as complete as they should be.
We
obtain statements from any members of the firm’s staff who
were involved, for example, in updating the records or in moving
the box in question for any reason.
We
also question the customer. We ask about the box itself, what
was in it and how often the customer visited the branch to get
access to the box. And we will ask if the customer ever used any
other safe deposit service, since it is not unknown for missing
items to come to light in another location. Customers may sometimes
think our questions are intrusive, particularly as we will want
to know exactly what items they stored, added or removed (information
that the customers are not required to tell the firm). However,
in order to reach a decision on the case, it is important that
we have as full an understanding of the situation as possible.
Although
firms do not have information about the contents
of boxes, it is extremely important that they keep a record of
the actual boxes they have in safe custody. This will need updating
if a customer removes or replaces a box or deposits an additional
one. It is also essential that firms keep an accurate and complete
record of each visit a customer makes to get access to their box.
The
bank has a duty to keep customers’ boxes safe and it should
store them in a secure area. If a problem occurs and any boxes
are affected (for example, if there is a fire or a flood), then
the firm should tell the customers concerned straight away and
invite them to come in and check for any loss or damage.
Some
firms give their ‘safe custody’ customers a few practical
suggestions to help them make the most of the service. Some of
these suggestions may seem obvious points of common sense, but
they are points that have often been overlooked in the disputes
that come to us. For instance, although customers are not required
to tell firms what they have stored, it is a good idea for firms
to advise customers to keep their own list of the items they deposit,
and to update this whenever there are any changes. If customers
store important papers in the box, then it makes sense for them
to keep photocopies at home in case the originals are lost or
damaged. And customers may sometimes find it helpful to take photographs
of the items they deposit, particularly if there are any rare
or antique objects. Where possible, customers should also save
the purchase receipts for items they subsequently place in safe
custody.
Customers
do not always appreciate that the valuables they keep in safe
custody should be properly insured for their full value. Keeping
valuables in safe custody should not be seen as an alternative
to insuring them, but rather as a way of keeping insurance premiums
as low as possible. Where relevant, from time-to-time customers
should arrange professional valuations of any jewellery and other
valuable objects kept in safe custody.
Of
course, accidents can happen – and valuables stored in safe
custody boxes can be damaged. But this is less likely if the valuables
are properly stored. We have noticed in many of the cases referred
to us that the customers have simply kept their jewellery loose
inside the box. This makes it more vulnerable to loss or damage
if the box is moved or dropped. Jewellers recommend storing jewellery
(particularly pearls and gemstones) in fabric rolls, to keep it
secure and prevent individual items from knocking against one
another or becoming tangled.
And
in some of the disputes we see, the customers’ boxes have
not really been adequate for the task. So firms may find it helpful
to point out to customers the importance of ensuring their storage
boxes are well-maintained and can be properly secured. In one
case we saw, the customer had known for some time that her box
had a faulty fastening. Rather than get it repaired, she secured
the box with a rubber band. The rubber band eventually perished
and broke, leading to a dispute over whether the contents had
been tampered with. In another case, a customer had sealed his
box with sticky tape. This had dried and shrunk over time, giving
the false impression that someone had tried to open the box.
The
following case studies summarise two disputes we dealt with recently
involving safe custody boxes.
|
banking
case studies – safe deposit boxes
30/7
safe custody – no loss, but incorrect records
Mrs H said that when she went to remove some of the contents
of her locked safe-deposit box, she found some items of
jewellery missing. A member of the firm’s staff checked
the log book in which the firm entered details when anyone
had access to a box in safe custody. This showed that Mrs
H had last had access to the box the previous year. However,
when Mrs H was shown the entry, she said that the signature
was not hers. She denied having visited the branch the previous
year and she said that an unauthorised person must have
opened the box and taken the jewellery.
complaint
partly upheld
During our investigation, Mrs H recalled that she had, after
all, visited the firm’s premises and looked at the
box the previous year, on the date shown in the log book.
We concluded from the evidence that, having failed to obtain
Mrs H’s signature at the time, a member of the firm’s
staff had forged it. But we also concluded that Mrs H’s
safe deposit box had not been interfered with.
It would have needed the co-operation of three members of
staff to get access to the area where the box was kept,
and only Mrs H had a key to the box itself. The box was
undamaged and there were no signs that anyone had tried
to prise it open.
Our investigations were not helped by the fact that Mrs
H was very uncertain about the exact contents of her safe-deposit
box. She provided several conflicting lists of the items
she said were in the box. And she subsequently found at
home some of the jewellery she had previously told us she
always kept in safe custody. We therefore concluded that
her recollection of the contents was unreliable.
There was nothing to back up her allegation that an item
of jewellery had been stolen while in the firm’s care.
However, the member of the firm’s staff should not
have forged her signature in the log book. We awarded Mrs
H £250 for the confusion and inconvenience this had
caused.
...................................................
30/8
safe custody – locked box could not be found
Mr B deposited a locked box in safe custody at one of the
firm’s branches. A year or so later, that branch closed
and Mr B was told his box had been transferred to a branch
in a different part of town. But when he subsequently visited
that branch, the staff were unable to find his box. They
said they had no record of it and that he must have removed
it some time earlier and forgotten that he had done this.
complaint
settled
When we looked into the case, we found Mr B’s recollection
of events was a little confused. After insisting that he
had never been told about the change of branch, he later
told us that the firm had written to let him know about
it.
However, as we pointed out to the firm, if Mr B had withdrawn
his box, this should have been noted in the firm’s
records. As the firm was unable to produce any record of
the box, it seemed likely that it had been lost in the transfer
from one branch to another. The firm acknowledged this was
a strong possibility and it offered Mr B £500, which
he accepted.
...................................................
|
|