|
As we write this edition of ombudsman news (mid-September)
this is fast becoming a hot topic, featuring almost daily in the
national press. It is too soon for us to comment fully on our
approach, since cases are still under consideration. However,
in view of some of the speculation and misunderstanding about
where we are up to so far on this issue, we hope this note will
be helpful.
background
Over the past year, several lenders have introduced lower variable
mortgage rates for new borrowers. Most of their existing variable-rate
borrowers have been transferred to the lower rate, or can apply
to transfer to it. But the lenders have kept their previous, higher,
variable mortgage rates for some existing borrowers – mainly those
with discounted-rate or capped-rate deals. These borrowers are
told they must remain tied to the higher rate until the discounted
or capped rate comes to an end. what has happened so far? We have
received a number of complaints about several different lenders.
Some are still under investigation but in cases involving two
of the lenders, one of our adjudicators has reached the preliminary
conclusion that the borrowers were entitled to have their rates
linked to the lower variable rate.
It
is important to note that:
For both lenders, the preliminary outcome of the cases turned
on the interpretation of the borrowers’ individual mortgage contracts
– not on the principle of lenders having dual variable mortgage
rates. Was the rate in those contracts linked to the higher or
the lower rate?
Both lenders have appealed against the adjudicator’s preliminary
conclusions. The lenders and borrowers will be able to submit
additional evidence and arguments and the principal ombudsman
will then review the cases. Until the principal ombudsman reaches
his decision, we cannot say any more.
We
hope to be able to comment more fully in the next banking and
loans edition of ombudsman news, in three months’
time.
|